Competition Commission vs Small Medium Enterprises

The Competition Commission of India and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

The Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) have been globally recognized as a priority sector for growth and development and India is not an exception to this generality. In India, the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) contribute over 45 percent of the country s industrial production and around 40 percent of total exports. The SMEs increase competition, contribute comprehensively by the GDP ensure varied supply of goods and services and give customers wider and customized choice. Thus MSMEs unhesitatingly play a vital role and in fact they are the backbone of the Indian economy and prudence suggests that the backbone not only be protected but strengthened too on a perennial basis.

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) needs to know

What SMEs needs to know is that the law is applicable to them as well. The focus of law is not on “size of the enterprise” which could be in terms of assets /turnover or investment in plant and machinery etc. but on the effects of business practices on competition in the relevant market in India. However, it is unlikely that SMEs would unwittingly fall foul of the law. On individual basis, since SMEs lack market power, their actions are not likely to have appreciable adverse effects on competition in India. Moreover, the exclusions and exemptions from the applicability of law are likely to dilute the effectiveness of competition law which is increasingly believed to be benign for consumers, enterprises as well as economies.

Power of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

A SMEs or an Association can file information in the prescribed form with the CCI and request for enquiry against any delinquent enterprises in case the latter is allegedly indulging in anti-competitive practices/ agreement or abuse the dominant position. SMEs can also file objection with the CCI in response to public notice or otherwise against any proposed acquisition, merger or amalgamation as sometimes a survival of SME is threatened. Thus, there is an obligation on the CCI to listen to the aggrieved SMEs.

Competition Commission of India and Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT)

The Amendment made to the Act in 2007, casts an obligation upon the Central Government to establish Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT), which shall be a three member quasi –judicial body to

•Hear and dispose of appeals against any direction issued or decision made or the Order passed by the Commission;

•Adjudicate on any claim for compensation that may arise from the findings of the Commission or the Orders of the Appellate Tribunal in an appeal against any finding of the Commission or under section 42A or sub-section (2) of section 53Q of this Act, and pass Orders for the recovery of compensation under section 53N of the Act.

The Competition Appellate Tribunal will be guided by principle of natural justice and it can regulate its own procedure. COMPAT can dismiss a petition for default or decide it ex parte and such order of dismissal or ex parte order can be set aside. The proceedings before COMPAT are deemed to be judicial proceedings. If Appellate Tribunal cannot execute its order, it will be sent to Court within whose local jurisdiction the registered office of the company or place of residence of the person is situated. Order of the C OMPAT will be executed as a degree of court. COMPAT can directly send the order to a civil court for execution. The order will be executed by that Court as if it is a decree of that Court.

Procedure for Investigation of Combination by the Competition Commission of India

On coming to a prima facie opinion that the combination is likely to cause or has caused appreciable adverse effect on competition within the relevant market, the commission shall issue a show cause notice to parties to the combination calling upon them to show within 30 days of receipt as to why investigation of such combination should not be conducted. After the receipt of the response from the parties, the commission may call for a report from the DG within the time as may be specified.

Orders that CCI can pass in respect of Combinations

The commission is empowered to pass the following orders after the due process:

a)        Approve the combination where no appreciable adverse effect on competition in the relevant market in India;

b)        Direct that combination shall not take effect where the Commission is opinion that there is or is likely to have appreciable adverse effect on competition;

c)        Propose modification in the combination where the commission is of the appreciable adverse effect cause or likely to be caused by the combination can be eliminated by the modification.

Competition Law and Leniency Provisions

Most competition laws either exempt specific sectors and/ or types of economic activity, and /or have provision s for the granting of such exemptions in given situations. It is worth observing that there generally tend to be fewer exemptions in countries which have recently adopted competition laws (mainly developing and transition market economies) as compared with more industrialized nations. In India the Competition Commission of India ,While passing orders in respect of cartels , the Commission is vested with the discretion to impose a proportionate /lesser penalty than leviable under the Act upon a producer, seller, distributor, trader or service providers, provided the following conditions are met;

1.        Such producer, seller, distributor, trader or service provider included in the cartel had made full and true disclosure in respect of the alleged violations and such disclosure is vital.

2.        Such disclosure has been made before receipt of DG s report on investigation order under section 26 of the Act

3.        The party making disclosure s continues to co-operate with the Commission till the completion of proceedings before the commission.

4.        The party making disclosure s has;

a)        Complied with the condition of which the lesser penalty was imposed and

b)        Not given false evidence.

We, "PNJ Legal Consultants" are one of the well known organizations engaged in providing Consultancy Services keeping in mind the Client Service requirements.

Our team members deliver excellent performance in providing these services and our clients can avail the services at affordable prices.

Our sophisticated team has complete knowledge of various exercises and technicalities that are used in our services. Our services includes Strategy Consulting, GST Consulting, Asset Management, Feasibility Study, International Arbitration, Due Dilligence, Franchisee Consulting, Financial Audits, Operational Audits, Tax Heaven Registrations, Shareholder Agreements, Start up Consulting, IP Consulting, Taxation Services, Accounting system design and Mergers Acquisitions.

Contact at parascs@gmail.com or refer website www.pnjlegal.com

FINANCIAL INFORMATION TRANSPARENCY

FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND TRANSPARENCY RELATED DISCLOSURE FOR GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

1)        Financial Calendar

2)        Listing of Shares in Stock Exchange

3)        Details of Shareholders/ Shares

4)        International Listing

5)        Stock Market Data (Share Price Volatility)

6)        Share Transfer Process

7)        Dividend Payment

8)        Special Resolution by Postal Ballot

1)     Financial Calendar:

In all the companies disclosure of financial calendar include following data:

•Financial Calendar •Date, Time and Venue of Last Annual General Meeting •Book Closure Date •Dividend Payment Date •Date of Posting of Annual Report •Last Date of Receipt of Proxy forms •Approval Date of Quarterly Results •Stock Code •Special Resolution of Postal Ballot •Reporting on Conciliation of Account GAAP •Board Meeting Date •Probable Date of Dispatch of Warrants for Dividend

2)     Listing of Shares in Stock Exchange:

Listing means admission of securities to dealings on a recognized stock exchange. The securities may be of any public limited company, Central or State Government, quasi-governmental and other financial institutions/corporations, municipalities, etc.

The objectives of listing are mainly to:

•          Provide liquidity to securities;

•          Mobilize savings for economic development;

•          Protect interest of investors by ensuring full disclosures.

3)     Details of Shareholders/ Shares:

Following details of shareholders/shares are disclosed in sampled companies include:

•                   Name of Investors/Shareholders

•                   Number of shares and number of Shareholders

•                   Percentage of total shares and total Shareholders

•                   Percentage of Share Capital

•                   Amount of Shareholding

•                   Shareholding of Nominal Value

•                   Number of Shares held in demat form

4)     International Listing:

GDR (Global Depositary Receipt):

A global depositary receipt (GDR) is a bank certificate issued in more than one country for shares in a foreign company. The shares are held by a foreign branch of an international bank. The shares trade as domestic shares, but are offered for sale globally through the various bank branches.

A financial instrument used by private markets to raise capital denominated in either U.S. dollars or Euros.

ADR (American Depositary Receipt):

An American depositary receipt (ADR) is a negotiable certificate issued by a U.S. bank representing a specified number of shares (or one share) in a foreign stock that is traded on a U.S. exchange. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars, with the underlying security held by a U.S. financial institution overseas. ADRs help to reduce administration and duty costs that would otherwise be levied on each transaction. This is an excellent way to buy shares in a foreign company while realizing any dividends and capital gains in U.S. dollars. However, ADRs do not eliminate the currency and economic risks for the underlying shares in another country. For example, dividend payments in Euros would be converted to U.S. dollars, net of conversion expenses and foreign taxes and in accordance with the deposit agreement. ADRs are listed on the NYSE, AMEX or Nasdaq as well as OTC.

5)     Stock Market Data (Share Price Volatility):

Volatility is a statistical measure of the dispersion of returns for a given security or market index. Volatility can either be measured by using the standard deviation or variance between returns from that same security or market index. Commonly, the higher the volatility, the riskier the security. Stock price volatility is an indicator that is most often used by options traders to find changes in trends in the market place. There are two main types of stock volatility including Historical Volatility and Implied Volatility that are used in the options markets. The increase or decrease in volatility results from changes in investors emotions in the market place. More specifically greed and fear in the market place are the two main factors that cause stock prices to change. Stock price volatility tends to rise when there is new information released in the markets however the extent to which it rises is determined by the relevance of that new information as well as to the degree in which the news surprises investors.

6)     Share Transfer Process:

The shares of a company are movable property and are generally freely transferable. Though there might be certain restrictions on transfer of shares of private companies provided in the articles of the company, such restrictions are generally added to protect the rights of one set of investors or the shareholders. However, shares of a public company are always freely transferable. Here, researcher has taken 3 aspects of share transfer process which are normally disclosed in sampled companies.

•          Shares in physical form

•          Share transfer is allotted agent

•          Time period for share transfer process

Power of refusal to register transfer of shares is to be exercised by the company within thirty (30) days from the date on which the instrument of transfer or the intimation of transfer, as the case may be is delivered to the Company.

7)     Dividend Payment:

The term ‘dividend’ has been defined under Section 2(35) of the Companies Act, 2013. The term “Dividend” includes any interim dividend. It is an inclusive and not an exhaustive definition. According to the generally accepted definition, “dividend” means the profit of a company, which is not retained in the business and is distributed among the shareholders in proportion to the amount paid-up on the shares held by them.

8)     Special Resolution by Postal Ballot:

Applicable for E-Voting:

•                   Every listed company or

•                   A company having not less than one thousand shareholders shall provide to its members facility to exercise their right to vote at general meetings by electronic means.

•                   E-Voting Period:

•                   The e-voting shall remain open for not less than one day and not more than three days.

•                   In all such cases, such voting period shall be completed three days prior to the date of the general meeting.

We, "PNJ Legal Consultants" are one of the well known organizations engaged in providing Consultancy Services keeping in mind the Client Service requirements.

Our team members deliver excellent performance in providing these services and our clients can avail the services at affordable prices.

Our sophisticated team has complete knowledge of various exercises and technicalities that are used in our services. Our services includes Strategy Consulting, GST Consulting, Asset Management, Feasibility Study, International Arbitration, Due Dilligence, Franchisee Consulting, Financial Audits, Operational Audits, Tax Heaven Registrations, Shareholder Agreements, Start up Consulting, IP Consulting, Taxation Services, Accounting system design and Mergers Acquisitions.

Contact at parascs@gmail.com or refer website www.pnjlegal.com

What is a Lok Adalat?

Lok Adalat is a forum where the disputes/cases pending in the court of law or at pre-litigation stage are settled/ compromised amicably. The Lok Adalat has been given statutory status5 under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. Under the said Act, the award made by the Lok Adalat is deemed to be the decree of a civil court and is final and binding on all parties and no appeal lies before any court against its award.

The problem of unmanaged backlog of cases, mounting arrears and inordinate delay in disposal of cases in Courts at all levels lowest to the highest coupled with exorbitant expenses have undoubtedly attracted the attention of not only the lawyers, litigants, social activists, legal academics, legislature, judiciary but also everyone concerned with judicial reforms. The sole governing consideration, therefore, how to reduce the delay in disposal of cases, make the system resilient by removing its stratification, making the system less formal and truly inexpensive so as to bring justice within the reach of the poor.

Nature of cases to be referred to Lok Adalat

1. Any case pending before any court

2. Any dispute which has not been brought before any court and is likely to be filed before the court

Provided that any matter relating to an offence not compoundable under the law shall not be settled in Lok Adalat.

How to get the case referred to the Lok Adalat for settlement?

A) Case pending before the court:

1. If the parties agree to settle the dispute in Lok Adalat or

2. One of the parties makes an application to the court or

3. The court is satisfied that that the matter is an appropriate one for settlement in Lok Adalat

B) Any dispute at pre-litigative stage

The State Legal Services Authority or District Legal Services Authority as the case may be on receipt of an application from any one of the parties to any pre-litigation stage matter refer such matter to the Lok Adalat for amicable settlement.

Why should you opt for Lok Adalat?

1. There is no court fee and if the court fee is already paid at the time of institution of the case such amount will be refunded to the concerned party if the dispute is resolved by the Lok Adalat. The dispute are settled without bearing any expenses by the parties.

2. Lok Adalats are empowered to settles the both kind of matters which are already pending before courts and which are at pre-litigation stage. The parties have an opportunity to bring the dispute before this institution at any time irrespective of whether the case is instituted in the court of law or not.

3. The procedure followed by Lok Adalat is simple, flexible, non-technical and informal. There is no strict application of procedural laws like Civil Procedure Code and Evidence Act while determining the claims of the parties by Lok Adalat.

4. The lawyers are not essential to be appeared during the conciliation process of Lok Adalat. However, they can assist the Lok Adalat in its proceeding by helping the parties to understand contentious issues and available alternatives and can persuade them to arrive at a settlement of the dispute.

5. It dispenses justice to the disputants through collaborative and participatory efforts of lawyers, law teachers, judges, administrative authorities and social workers who actively participate in the resolution of the dispute by discussion, counselling, persuasion, conciliation and humane approach.

6. Lok Adalat provides justice speedily to the parties, generally, when it resolve the cases in a single day. In this sense it helps to reduce the huge arrears in courts of law.

7. The award of Lok Adalat is final and binding. There are no further appeals, revisions or review applications. Therefore, the dispute ordinarily comes to an end.

8. The Lok Adalat system helps to create awareness among the people about their rights and duties mentioned in numerous social and welfare legislations. Lok Adalats are organized at various places such as villages, slum areas, industrial areas, labour colonies, towns and in jails, etc. In this way, it takes justice at the door-steps of the people.

9. The Lok Adalat settle the dispute on the basis of compromise and in the spirit of 'give and take'. Thus, there is neither a victor nor a vanquished and both the contestants are gainers and winners. They leave the premises smiling with no rancor or ill feeling for the other which ultimately leads to happiness and well-being of the society. So, the drive behind the Lok Adalat is the roused consciousness of the community to prevent disruption of local unity and to secure substantial equity and social justice, in a mood of human solidarity.

Permanent Lok Adalat

Permanent Lok Adalat has to be established by the National legal Services Authority or the State Legal Services Authorities. It shall have three members; the Chairman, who is or has been a District Judge or an Additional District Judge or has held a judicial office higher in rank than that of a District Judge and two other members having adequate experience in public utility service. Such persons shall be appointed by the State or the Central Authority, as the case may be, upon nomination by the respective Governments. But at the same time, such nomination shall be on the recommendation of the Central or the State authority. Section 22-C (3) provides that when an application is filed written statements with appropriate proof, including documents and other evidence. Copies of documents produced and statements made by the parties shall be given to each other. Therefore, PLA shall conduct conciliation proceedings between the parties to bring about an amicable settlement to the dispute. It is the primary duty of PLA as per Section 22-C (4). While conducting such conciliation proceedings, it is incumbent on the members of PLA to assist the parties to reach an amicable settlement.

We, "PNJ Legal Consultants" are one of the well known organizations engaged in providing Consultancy Services keeping in mind the Client Service requirements.

Our team members deliver excellent performance in providing these services and our clients can avail the services at affordable prices.

Our sophisticated team has complete knowledge of various exercises and technicalities that are used in our services. Our services includes Strategy Consulting, GST Consulting, Asset Management, Feasibility Study, International Arbitration, Due Dilligence, Franchisee Consulting, Financial Audits, Operational Audits, Tax Heaven Registrations, Shareholder Agreements, Start up Consulting, IP Consulting, Taxation Services, Accounting system design and Mergers Acquisitions.

Contact at parascs@gmail.com or refer website www.pnjlegal.com

THE REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 2016

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 which seeks to protect home-buyers as well as help boost investments in the real estate industry.

Coverage of this act:-

Ø The Real Estate Act makes it mandatory for all commercial and residential real estate projects where the land is over 500 square meters, or eight apartments, to register with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) for launching a project, in order to provide greater transparency in project-marketing and execution

Ø For on-going projects which have not received completion certificate on the date of commencement of the Act, will have to seek registration within 3 months. Application for registration must be either approved or rejected within a period of 30 days from the date of application by the RERA. On successful registration, the promoter of the project will be provided with a registration number, a login id and password for the applicants to fill up essential details on the website of the RERA. For failure to register, a penalty of up to 10 percent of the project cost or three years' imprisonment may be imposed.

PROTECTION OF BUYERS

Ø The Act prohibits unaccounted money from being pumped into the sector and as of now 70 per cent of the money has to be deposited in bank accounts through cheques.

Real Estate Regulatory Authority and Appellate Tribunal

It will help to establish state-level Real Estate Regulatory Authorities (RERAs) to regulate transactions related to both residential and commercial projects and ensure their timely completion and handover. Appellate Tribunals will now be required to adjudicate cases in 60 days as against the earlier provision of 90 days and Regulatory Authorities to dispose of complaints in 60 days while no time frame was indicated in earlier Bill.

Certain areas to be exempted from the RERA

Ø The Real Estate Act makes it mandatory for all commercial and residential real estate projects where the land is over 500 square meters, or eight apartments, to register with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) for launching a project, in order to provide greater transparency in project-marketing and execution. Where the area of land does not exceed to 500 square meters or the no. of apartments does exceed to be developed.

Ø Provided that: If the appropriate government considers it necessary, it may, reduce the threshold below five hundred square meters or eight apartments, as the case may be.

Ø Promoter has received the completion certificate for real estate project prior to commencement act.

REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY

Ø  Authority is established and incorporated under section 20. According to section u/s 35 Authority has power to take sue motto complaints and inquire against information and conduct the enquiry or invest on that matter. Authority can take cognizance on the sue motto if they necessary to so.

Ø According to section 36 interim order cabs are passed by the authority. 

Ø  Authority can be issue direction u/s 37.

Ø Authority has power u/s 38 to impose the penalty or interest.

Ø Authority has power to rectify its order any time within a period of 2years from the date of order made u/s 39.

If somebody does not agree to the direction or order of Authority then that person can file an appeal under REAL ESTATE APPELATE TRIBUNAL.

REAL ESTATE APPELATE TRIBUNAL

Ø REAL ESTATE APPELATE TRIBUNAL is established under section 43. As per s.43 (5) appeal of promoter would be entertained only on depositing at least 30% of the penalty on higher percentage determined by the appellate tribunal.

Ø As per section 44(5) appellate authority should be endeavor to dispose off the appeal within a period of 60days from the date of receipt.

Ø As per section 58 appeals can be filled against Appellate Tribunal within 60 days of communication of the order of the Appellate tribunal. In case of delay adequate reasoning is required.

OFFENSES AND PENALITIES

Ø As per section 59(1) punishment for non registeration u/s 3 for promoter would be penalty which may extend up to 10% of the estimated cost of the Real Estate Project as determined by the Authority.

Ø As per s.59(2) if the order passed u/s 59(1) is not complicated then promoter shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extended up to 3yrs or with fine which extend to further 10% of the estimated cost of the project.

Ø As per s.60 the penalty for contravention of s4. of promoter would be penalty which may extend up to 5% the estimated cost of the Real Estate Project as determined by the Authority.

Ø As per the s.61 penalty for the contravention of provision of this act and rules other than s.3 and s.4 for the promoter shall be a penalty which may extend to 5% of the estimated cost of the real estate project as determined by the authority

Ø As per s.62 non registration and contravention u/s 9 and 10 done by Real estate agent, in such case he shall be liable to a penalty of rs10000 for everyday during such default continues, which may cumulatively extend up to 5%of the cost of the plot, apppartment or building, as the case may be, of the Real estate project, for which the sale or purchase has been facilitated as determined by the authority.

Ø As per s.63 penalty for failure to comply with the order of Authority would be penalty for everyday during which such default continues, which may cumulatively extend up to 5% of the real estate project as determined by the authority

Ø As per s.64 punishment for contravention of order of Appellate Tribunal by promoter shall be imprisonment for term which may extend up to 3yrs or fine for everyday during which such default continues, which may cumulatively extend up to 10% of the estimated cost of the real estate project or with both.

Ø As per s.65 penalty for failure to comply with order of the Authority by the real estate agent shall be a penalty for everyday during which default continues, which may cumulatively extend up to 5% of the estimated cost of plot, apartment or building or the case may be.

Ø As per s.68 punishment for the failure to comply with order of Authority by allottee shall be imprisonment for a term which may extend up to one year or with fine for everyday during which default continues, which may cumulatively extend up to 10% of the plot or with both

Ø As per the compounding of offences can be done either before or after institution of prosecution before court and any payments of sum shall not in any case, exceeded the maximum amount of the fine which may be imposed for the offense so compounded.

Ø As per section s.80 cognizance of offence can be taken by court on a complaint in writing made by the authority or by any officer of the authority duly authorized by it for this purpose.

We, "PNJ Legal Consultants" are one of the well known organizations engaged in providing Consultancy Services keeping in mind the Client Service Mentality.

Our team members deliver excellent performance in providing these services and our clients can avail the services at affordable prices.

Our sophisticated team has complete knowledge of various exercises and technicalities that are used in our services. Our services includes Strategy Consulting, GST Consulting, Asset Management, Feasibility Study, International Arbitration, Due Dilligence, Franchisee Consulting, Financial Audits, Operational Audits, Tax Heaven Registrations, Shareholder Agreements, Start up Consulting, IP Consulting, Taxation Services, Accounting system design and Mergers Acquisitions.

Contact at parascs@gmail.com or refer website www.pnjlegal.com

SHOULD INDIAN LAWYERS BE ALLOWED TO WORK ON CONTINGENCY

The Bar Council of India prohibits advocates from charging fees to their clients contingent on the results of litigation or pay a percentage or share of the claims awarded by the Court. Bar Council of India Rules: Part VI, Chapter II, Section II, Rule 20 which reads as under:

“20. An advocate shall not stipulate for a fee contingent on the results of litigation or agree to share the proceeds thereof.”

Many have the misconception that the reason why lawyers do not work on a contingency basis is that such an agreement between the lawyer and client would be a wagering one, and therefore are void. Apart from the Bar Council Rules which have expressly prohibited it, in the landmark case of Ganga Ram v. Devi Das, 61 P.R. (1907), such an agreement was held to be void for being against public policy and also against professional ethics. 

 However, although prohibited, in several cases, especially those before the lower Courts, clients are charged on the percentage of claim amount that the lawyer is able to recover. However, the practice though prevalent, has hardly led to disputes and is can seldom be proved. Reason being that the contingency agreement is always oral and highly informal. It must be remembered that such an agreement is not only void but also would lead to the lawyer facing disciplinary action by the Bar Council and a chance of losing one’s license to practice at the Bar.

Contingency fees exist in the civil realm because the attorney "attaches" their fee to the resulting award; if there is no award, there is no fee. Many states also bar attorneys from taking divorce cases on contingency for similar reasons -- there's not an "award" but rather a separation of property. Further, it's an ethical issue that could result in the attorney preferring a plea bargain over going to trial, in order to further their interest in securing payment from the client, rather than taking the client's best interest. This isn't as much of a concern in the civil realm, because someone's not going to prison; they're just settling a dispute between private parties.

The main reason for the express prohibition in the Bar Council of India Rules is probably because lawyers must not be allowed to have ulterior interests in the outcome of the case. They are considered to be of a ‘noble profession’, and are officers of the Court. Their main objective must be Justice and not financial gain.

 If they were interested in the matter, they might adopt unfair means or allow their emotions to get the best of them. Sometimes, the Court may grant an alternate remedy then the one paid for, which the contingency agreement does not cover. In such case it is difficult to determine the lawyer’s fee. This may lead to unimaginable amount of disputes between lawyer and client.

Although theoretically this may seem like a very good reasoning, but in practice the Contingency Fee system is a boon to poor clients. There must be several people in India, who even though they have been wronged, do not take legal action because of the legal expenses and the fear that even after somehow being able to meet those expenses, still losing the suit. If the abovementioned rule is removed from the Bar Council of India Rules, then this transaction can be developed. Written and formal documents can come into existence with clear cut clauses for every possible outcome, as well as whether out-of-pocket expenses are also to be paid are also contingent

K.L. GAUBA VS UNKNOWN

This is an application under our disciplinary jurisdiction against Mr. K. L. Gauba. It came to the notice of this Court that Mr. Gauba, who is an advocate of this Court, had entered into an agreement with his client, one Amarnath Bhardwaj, which appeared to be champertous and this Court took the view that the circumstances under which the said agreement had been entered into and the terms of the agreement itself called for an investigation under the disciplinary jurisdiction, and so it was decided to refer this case to the Bar Council.

Accordingly, on May 1, 1953, the learned Chief justice appointed three members of the Bar Council to constitute a Tribunal under Section 11 of the Bar Councils Act for inquiring into this case. Notice of the intended inquiry was served on Mr. Gauba in due course. He appeared before the Bar Council Tribunal, gave his explanation on July 10 and filed an additional statement on August 6, 1953. The matter was then heard by the Members of the Tribunal and they made the report on December 16, 1953. The Tribunal has held that the respondent had entered into an agreement with the client that he should be given half of the profits of the litigation in case of success and this in the opinion of the Tribunal amounted to professional misconduct. After this report was received, notice of the hearing of the present application was served on Mr. Gauba and the matter has thus come before us for final disposal.

It would thus seem that the American decisions are based upon the statutory law upon the subject as obtaining in America. In India, however, we have got the provisions ofSection 23 of the Indian Contract Act according to which the agreements like the agreement in this case being against public policy must be deprecated. I, therefore, agree with my learned brother that Mr. Gauba's conduct in this case was grossly unprofessional and most objectionable

Law Commission fails    

The Law Commission of India has failed to address the issue of excessive litigation cost in the country which is predominantly the result of unfair levy of fees by lawyers. In its 240th report (May 2012), the commission examined several state rules on fees and strangely, pleaded for enhancement of fees! According to the report, fee prescribed in the rules is ‘so meager’.  

Rules do not cover all types of cases or courts and, therefore, the major varieties of fee are outside their ambit. Levying of fee by lawyers in India is not by and large governed by any rules at all, and even in areas covered by the rules, as in civil litigation, they are honored only in their breach.  

Ø The public view of eminence in advocacy also needs to be changed.

The artificial and luxurious misconceptions about professional greatness need to be exposed and fairness in fixation of remuneration recaptured. While recognising the labour behind research, travel and homework, the litigant also should be guaranteed fairness in dealings. We are yet to realise the significance of proper guidance and genuine legal consultation. It is reasonable to charge for a fair advice after due consultation than charging exorbitantly for a fruitless litigation based on an erroneous or casual advice.

The country should change its litigation habits. More egalitarian and sophisticated methods of dispute resolution like arbitration and conciliation are to be encouraged in areas ranging from business to matrimonial disputes. The iron wall between legal profession and society is only to be smashed and the profession demystified. There is a real need to evolve a national movement for fair advocacy which should take in lawmen as well as laymen from all the states. 

Types of Legal Fees:-

The type of fee arrangement that you make with your lawyer will have a significant impact on how much you will pay for the services. Legal fees depend on several factors, including the amount of time spent on your problem; the lawyer's ability, experience, and reputation; the novelty and difficulty of the case; the results obtained; and costs involved. There will be other factors such as the lawyer's overhead expenses (rent, utilities, office equipment, computers, etc.) that may affect the fee charged.

There are several common types of fee arrangements used by lawyers:

• Consultation Fee: The lawyer may charge a fixed or hourly fee for your first meeting where you both determine whether the lawyer can assist you. Be sure to check whether you will be charged for this initial meeting.
• Contingency Fees: The lawyer's fee is based on a percentage of the amount awarded in the case. If you lose the case, the lawyer does not get a fee, but you will still have to pay expenses. Contingency fee percentages vary. A one-third fee is common. Some lawyers offer a sliding scale based on how far along the case has progressed before it is settled. Courts may set a limit on the amount of a contingency fee a lawyer can receive. This type of fee arrangement may be charged in personal injury cases, property damage cases, or other cases where a large amount of money is involved. Lawyers may also be prohibited from making contingency fee arrangements in certain kinds of cases such as criminal and child custody matters. Contingency fee arrangements are typically not available for divorce matters, if you are being sued, or if you are seeking general legal advice such as the purchase or sale of a business.
• Flat Fees: A lawyer charges a specific, total fee. A flat fee is usually offered only if your case is relatively simple or routine such as a will or an uncontested divorce.
• Hourly Rate: The lawyer will charge you for each hour (or portion of an hour) that the lawyer works on your case. Thus, for example, if the lawyer's fee is $100 per hour and the lawyer works 5 hours, the fee will be $500. This is the most typical fee arrangement. Some lawyers charge different fees for different types of work (legal research versus a court appearance). In addition, lawyers working in large firms typically have different fee scales with more senior members charging higher fees than young associates or paralegals.
• Referral Fee: A lawyer who refers you to another lawyer may ask for a portion of the total fee you pay for the case. Referral fees may be prohibited under applicable state codes of professional responsibility unless certain criteria are met. Just like other fees, the total fee must be reasonable and you must agree to the arrangement. Your state or local bar association may have additional information about the appropriateness of a referral fee.
• Retainer Fees: The lawyer is paid a set fee, perhaps based on the lawyer's hourly rate. You can think of a retainer as a "down payment" against which future costs are billed. The retainer is usually placed in a special account and the cost of services is deducted from that account as they accrue. Many retainer fees are non-refundable unless the fee is deemed unreasonable by a court. A retainer fee can also mean that the lawyer is "on call" to handle your legal problems over a period of time. Since this type of fee arrangement can mean several different things, be sure to have the lawyer explain the retainer fee arrangement in detail.
• Statutory Fee: The fees in some cases may be set by statute or a court may set and approve a fee that you pay. These types of fees may appear in probate, bankruptcy, or other proceedings.

With all types of fee arrangements you should ask what costs and other expenses are covered in the fee. Does the fee include the lawyer's overhead and costs or are those charged separately? How will the costs for staff, such as secretaries, messengers, or paralegals be charged. In contingency fee arrangements, make sure to find out whether the lawyer calculates the fee before or after expenses.

We, "PNJ Legal Consultants" are one of the well known organizations engaged in providing Consultancy Services keeping in mind the Client Service Mentality.

We have a team of highly qualified professionals and time to time training is provided by us as per the requirements. Our team members deliver excellent performance in providing these services and our clients can avail the services at affordable prices.

Our sophisticated team has complete knowledge of various exercises and technicalities that are used in our services. Our services includes Strategy Consulting, GST Consulting, Asset Management, Feasibility Study, International Arbitration, Due Dilligence, Franchisee Consulting, Financial Audits, Operational Audits, Tax Heaven Registrations, Shareholder Agreements, Start up Consulting, IP Consulting, Taxation Services, Accounting system design and Mergers Acquisitions.

Contact at parascs@gmail.com or refer website www.pnjlegal.com